ATI Radeon VE PCI vs GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking286not rated
Place by popularity59not in top-100
Power efficiency28.46no data
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2025)Rage 6 (2000−2007)
GPU code nameGN20-P0Rage 6
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date11 May 2021 (4 years ago)19 February 2001 (24 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048no data
Core clock speed1238 MHz183 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data30 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt (35 - 80 Watt TGP)23 Watt
Texture fill rateno data0.55
ROPsno data1
TMUsno data3

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCI
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6DDR
Maximum RAM amount4 GB32 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed12000 MHz183 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data2.928 GB/s
Shared memory-no data
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_27.0
OpenGLno data1.3
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 May 2021 19 February 2001
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 32 MB
Chip lithography 8 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 23 Watt

RTX 3050 4GB Mobile has an age advantage of 20 years, a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2150% more advanced lithography process.

ATI VE PCI, on the other hand, has 160.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile and Radeon VE PCI. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Radeon VE PCI is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
ATI Radeon VE PCI
Radeon VE PCI

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 1906 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Radeon VE PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile or Radeon VE PCI, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.