ATI Radeon HD 4225 vs GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking286not rated
Place by popularity59not in top-100
Power efficiency28.46no data
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2025)RV6xx (2008−2010)
GPU code nameGN20-P0RS880M
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date11 May 2021 (4 years ago)1 May 2010 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores204840
Core clock speed1238 MHz380 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHzno data
Manufacturing process technology8 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt (35 - 80 Watt TGP)no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GB512 MB
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed12000 MHzno data
Shared memory-+
Resizable BAR+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_210.1

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RTX 3050 4GB Mobile 43216
+30659%
ATI HD 4225 141

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 May 2021 1 May 2010
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 8 nm 55 nm

RTX 3050 4GB Mobile has an age advantage of 11 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 587.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile and Radeon HD 4225. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
ATI Radeon HD 4225
Radeon HD 4225

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 1928 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 4 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4225 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile or Radeon HD 4225, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.