ATI Mobility FireGL 7800 vs GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking287not rated
Place by popularity57not in top-100
Power efficiency28.46no data
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2025)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameGN20-P0M7
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date11 May 2021 (4 years ago)29 September 2001 (24 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20482
Core clock speed1238 MHz280 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHz280 MHz
Number of transistorsno data60 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt (35 - 80 Watt TGP)27 Watt
Texture fill rateno data0.56
ROPsno data2
TMUsno data2

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
Interfaceno dataAGP 4x

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6DDR
Maximum RAM amount4 GB64 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed12000 MHz200 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data6.4 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_27.0
OpenGLno data1.3
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 May 2021 29 September 2001
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 8 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 27 Watt

RTX 3050 4GB Mobile has an age advantage of 19 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1775% more advanced lithography process.

ATI Mobility FireGL 7800, on the other hand, has 122.2% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile and Mobility FireGL 7800. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Mobility FireGL 7800 is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
ATI Mobility FireGL 7800
Mobility FireGL 7800

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 1968 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Mobility FireGL 7800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile or Mobility FireGL 7800, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.