ATI All-In-Wonder X800 VE vs GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking285not rated
Place by popularity53not in top-100
Power efficiency28.44no data
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2025)R400 (2004−2008)
GPU code nameGN20-P0R420
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date11 May 2021 (4 years ago)27 April 2005 (20 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048no data
Core clock speed1238 MHz425 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data160 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt (35 - 80 Watt TGP)no data
Texture fill rateno data3.400
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataAGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount4 GB256 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed12000 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data12.8 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_29.0b (9_2)
OpenGLno data2.0
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 May 2021 27 April 2005
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 8 nm 130 nm

RTX 3050 4GB Mobile has an age advantage of 16 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1525% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile and All-In-Wonder X800 VE. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is a notebook graphics card while All-In-Wonder X800 VE is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
ATI All-In-Wonder X800 VE
All-In-Wonder X800 VE

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 1891 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate All-In-Wonder X800 VE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile or All-In-Wonder X800 VE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.