ATI 3D Rage LT PRO AGP vs GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking286not rated
Place by popularity53not in top-100
Power efficiency28.44no data
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2025)no data
GPU code nameGN20-P0Rage LT
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date11 May 2021 (4 years ago)1 November 1997 (28 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048no data
Core clock speed1238 MHz75 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data8 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm350 nm
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt (35 - 80 Watt TGP)no data
Texture fill rateno data0.08
ROPsno data1
TMUsno data1

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataAGP 2x
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6SDR
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed12000 MHz100 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data800 MB/s
Shared memory-no data
Resizable BAR+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_26.0
OpenGLno data1.1
OpenCLno dataNone

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 May 2021 1 November 1997
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 MB
Chip lithography 8 nm 350 nm

RTX 3050 4GB Mobile has an age advantage of 23 years, a 51100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 4275% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile and 3D Rage LT PRO AGP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is a notebook graphics card while 3D Rage LT PRO AGP is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
ATI 3D Rage LT PRO AGP
3D Rage LT PRO AGP

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 1894 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3 votes

Rate 3D Rage LT PRO AGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile or 3D Rage LT PRO AGP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.