GMA vs GeForce RTX 2080

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking961604
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation21.29no data
Power efficiency15.94no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)PowerVR SGX545 (2008−2010)
GPU code nameTU104Cloverview
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date20 September 2018 (7 years ago)4 May 2010 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$699 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2944no data
Core clock speed1515 MHz533 MHz
Boost clock speed1710 MHzno data
Number of transistors13,600 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)215 Wattno data
Texture fill rate314.61.066
Floating-point processing power10.07 TFLOPSno data
ROPs641
TMUs1842
Tensor Cores368no data
Ray Tracing Cores46no data
L1 Cache2.9 MBno data
L2 Cache4 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount8 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1750 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a, 1x USB Type-CNo outputs
HDMI+-
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)9.0c
Shader Model6.83.0
OpenGL4.6ES 2.0
OpenCL3.0N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA7.5-
DLSS+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 2080 18598
+929800%
Samples: 11496
GMA 2
Samples: 1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD144no data
1440p101no data
4K73no data

Cost per frame, $

1080p4.85no data
1440p6.92no data
4K9.58no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 240−250 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110 no data
Resident Evil 4 Remake 120−130 no data

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 163 no data
Counter-Strike 2 240−250 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110 no data
Far Cry 5 117 no data
Fortnite 199 no data
Forza Horizon 4 156 no data
Forza Horizon 5 140−150 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 209 no data
Valorant 263 no data

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 155 no data
Counter-Strike 2 240−250 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110 no data
Dota 2 140−150 no data
Far Cry 5 112 no data
Fortnite 173 no data
Forza Horizon 4 153 no data
Forza Horizon 5 140−150 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 131 no data
Metro Exodus 90 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 188 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 181 no data
Valorant 254 no data

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 145 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110 no data
Dota 2 140−150 no data
Far Cry 5 106 no data
Forza Horizon 4 132 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 169 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 106 no data
Valorant 223 no data

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 156 no data

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 120−130 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 300−350 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 95−100 no data
Metro Exodus 60 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 no data
Valorant 247 no data

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 125 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60 no data
Far Cry 5 99 no data
Forza Horizon 4 118 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 90−95 no data

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 128 no data

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 50−55 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 107 no data
Metro Exodus 39 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 76 no data
Valorant 234 no data

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 76 no data
Counter-Strike 2 50−55 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27 no data
Dota 2 120−130 no data
Far Cry 5 59 no data
Forza Horizon 4 81 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 69 no data

4K
Epic

Fortnite 65 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 September 2018 4 May 2010
Chip lithography 12 nm 32 nm

RTX 2080 has an age advantage of 8 years, and a 167% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 2080 and GMA. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 2080 is a desktop graphics card while GMA is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 2684 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2080 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.1 12 votes

Rate GMA on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce RTX 2080 or GMA, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.