ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP vs GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking149not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency18.69no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameTU104BRV610
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date29 January 2019 (7 years ago)28 June 2007 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores294440
Core clock speed1380 MHz525 MHz
Boost clock speed1590 MHzno data
Number of transistors13,600 million180 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt20 Watt
Texture fill rate292.62.100
Floating-point processing power9.362 TFLOPS0.042 TFLOPS
ROPs644
TMUs1844
Tensor Cores368no data
Ray Tracing Cores46no data
L1 Cache2.9 MBno data
L2 Cache4 MB32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6DDR2
Maximum RAM amount8 GB256 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed14000 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth384.0 GB/s6.4 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)10.0 (10_0)
Shader Model6.54.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA7.5-
DLSS+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 January 2019 28 June 2007
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 12 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 20 Watt

RTX 2080 Mobile has an age advantage of 11 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 442% more advanced lithography process.

ATI HD 2400 PRO AGP, on the other hand, has 650% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile and Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 180 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 4 votes

Rate Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile or Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.