Radeon Pro 570X vs GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 66 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 17.96 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 15.79 | no data |
| Architecture | Turing (2018−2022) | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) |
| GPU code name | TU102 | Polaris 20 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 20 September 2018 (7 years ago) | 18 March 2019 (6 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 4352 | 1792 |
| Core clock speed | 1350 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1545 MHz | 1105 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 18,600 million | 5,700 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | 120 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 420.2 | 123.8 |
| Floating-point processing power | 13.45 TFLOPS | 3.96 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 88 | 32 |
| TMUs | 272 | 112 |
| Tensor Cores | 544 | no data |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 68 | no data |
| L1 Cache | 4.3 MB | 448 KB |
| L2 Cache | 5.5 MB | 2 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | no data |
| Width | 2-slot | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 11 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bus width | 352 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz | 1700 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 616.0 GB/s | 217.6 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a, 1x USB Type-C | No outputs |
| HDMI | + | - |
| G-SYNC support | + | - |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| VR Ready | + | no data |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.8 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 7.5 | - |
| DLSS | + | - |
Synthetic benchmarks
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
GeekBench 5 OpenCL
Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.
GeekBench 5 Vulkan
Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 20 September 2018 | 18 March 2019 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 11 GB | 4 GB |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | 120 Watt |
RTX 2080 Ti has a 175% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.
Pro 570X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 months, and 108.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 2080 Ti and Radeon Pro 570X. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Pro 570X is a mobile workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
