A2 vs GeForce RTX 2080 Ti

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking35not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation43.73no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2021)Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code nameTuring TU102GA107
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date27 August 2018 (5 years ago)10 November 2021 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$999 no data
Current price$297 (0.3x MSRP)$55

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores43521280
Core clock speed1350 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1545 MHz1770 MHz
Number of transistors18,600 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)270 Watt60 Watt
Texture fill rate420.270.80

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount11 GB16 GB
Memory bus width352 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed14000 MHz12.5 GB/s
Memory bandwidth616.0 GB/s200.1 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-CNo outputs
HDMI+no data
G-SYNC support+no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2
CUDA7.58.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

RTX 2080 Ti 138717
+293%
A2 35262

GeForce RTX 2080 Ti outperforms A2 by 293% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 5%

RTX 2080 Ti 133178
+285%
A2 34563

GeForce RTX 2080 Ti outperforms A2 by 285% in GeekBench 5 Vulkan.

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

Benchmark coverage: 4%

RTX 2080 Ti 165093
+333%
A2 38140

GeForce RTX 2080 Ti outperforms A2 by 333% in GeekBench 5 CUDA.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 August 2018 10 November 2021
Maximum RAM amount 11 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 270 Watt 60 Watt

We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 2080 Ti and A2. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
NVIDIA A2
A2

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 3820 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2080 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.1 19 votes

Rate A2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.