GMA 3100 vs GeForce RTX 2070
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 123 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 27.42 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 16.69 | no data |
| Architecture | Turing (2018−2022) | Generation 4.0 (2006−2007) |
| GPU code name | TU106 | Bearlake |
| Market segment | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 17 October 2018 (6 years ago) | 9 May 2007 (18 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2304 | no data |
| Core clock speed | 1410 MHz | 400 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1620 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 10,800 million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 175 Watt | 13 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 233.3 | 1.600 |
| Floating-point processing power | 7.465 TFLOPS | no data |
| ROPs | 64 | 4 |
| TMUs | 144 | 4 |
| Tensor Cores | 288 | no data |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 36 | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Length | 229 mm | no data |
| Width | 2-slot | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR6 | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | System Shared |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | System Shared |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz | System Shared |
| Memory bandwidth | 448.0 GB/s | no data |
| Shared memory | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | No outputs |
| HDMI | + | - |
| G-SYNC support | + | - |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| VR Ready | + | no data |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_1) | 9.0c |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.0 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | N/A |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| CUDA | 7.5 | - |
| DLSS | + | - |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 17 October 2018 | 9 May 2007 |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 175 Watt | 13 Watt |
RTX 2070 has an age advantage of 11 years, and a 650% more advanced lithography process.
GMA 3100, on the other hand, has 1246.2% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 2070 and GMA 3100. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that GeForce RTX 2070 is a desktop graphics card while GMA 3100 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
