Radeon HD 8400 Mobile IGP vs GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile Refresh

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameTU106BKalindi
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date19 January 2020 (4 years ago)23 November 2013 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2304128
Core clock speed1305 MHz600 MHz
Boost clock speed1485 MHzno data
Number of transistors10,800 million1,178 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)115 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate213.84.800
Floating-point processing power6.843 TFLOPS0.1536 TFLOPS
ROPs644
TMUs1448
Tensor Cores288no data
Ray Tracing Cores36no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16IGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount8 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1750 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.56.3
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.1401.2.131
CUDA7.5-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 January 2020 23 November 2013
Chip lithography 12 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 115 Watt 25 Watt

RTX 2070 Mobile Refresh has an age advantage of 6 years, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

HD 8400 Mobile IGP, on the other hand, has 360% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile Refresh and Radeon HD 8400 Mobile IGP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile Refresh is a notebook card while Radeon HD 8400 Mobile IGP is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile Refresh
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile Refresh
AMD Radeon HD 8400 Mobile IGP
Radeon HD 8400 Mobile IGP

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 29 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile Refresh on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 6 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8400 Mobile IGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.