GeForce 8400 vs RTX 2070 Mobile Refresh
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 1463 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 0.58 |
| Architecture | Turing (2018−2022) | Tesla (2006−2010) |
| GPU code name | TU106B | G98 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 19 January 2020 (6 years ago) | 4 December 2007 (18 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $69.78 |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2304 | 8 |
| Core clock speed | 1305 MHz | 540 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1485 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 10,800 million | 210 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 115 Watt | 25 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 213.8 | 4.320 |
| Floating-point processing power | 6.843 TFLOPS | 0.0208 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64 | 4 |
| TMUs | 144 | 8 |
| Tensor Cores | 288 | no data |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 36 | no data |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB | no data |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 16 KB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Width | no data | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR6 | DDR2 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 256 MB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz | 500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 448.0 GB/s | 8 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.140 | N/A |
| CUDA | 7.5 | 1.1 |
| DLSS | + | - |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 19 January 2020 | 4 December 2007 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 256 MB |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 115 Watt | 25 Watt |
RTX 2070 Mobile Refresh has an age advantage of 12 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 441.7% more advanced lithography process.
GeForce 8400, on the other hand, has 360% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile Refresh and GeForce 8400. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile Refresh is a notebook graphics card while GeForce 8400 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
