Radeon Graphics 448SP Mobile vs GeForce RTX 2070 Super

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking70not rated
Place by popularity88not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation42.66no data
Power efficiency16.13no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameTU104Barcelo
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date9 July 2019 (5 years ago)6 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2560448
Core clock speed1605 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1770 MHz1800 MHz
Number of transistors13,600 million10,700 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)215 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate283.250.40
Floating-point processing power9.062 TFLOPS1.613 TFLOPS
ROPs648
TMUs16028
Tensor Cores320no data
Ray Tracing Cores40no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16IGP
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount8 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1750 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-CPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.7 (6.4)
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA7.5-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 9 July 2019 6 January 2022
Chip lithography 12 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 215 Watt 45 Watt

Graphics 448SP Mobile has an age advantage of 2 years, a 71.4% more advanced lithography process, and 377.8% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 2070 Super and Radeon Graphics 448SP Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 2070 Super is a desktop card while Radeon Graphics 448SP Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
GeForce RTX 2070 Super
AMD Radeon Graphics 448SP Mobile
Radeon Graphics 448SP Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 4765 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2070 Super on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 29 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics 448SP Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.