GeForce GTX 295 Single PCB vs RTX 2070 Super
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 94 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | 81 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 35.54 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 15.36 | no data |
| Architecture | Turing (2018−2022) | Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013) |
| GPU code name | TU104 | GT200B |
| Market segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Release date | 9 July 2019 (6 years ago) | 16 June 2009 (16 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | $499 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2560 | 240 ×2 |
| Core clock speed | 1605 MHz | 576 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 13,600 million | 1,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 55 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 215 Watt | 289 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 283.2 | 46.08 ×2 |
| Floating-point processing power | 9.062 TFLOPS | 0.5962 TFLOPS ×2 |
| ROPs | 64 | 28 ×2 |
| TMUs | 160 | 80 ×2 |
| Tensor Cores | 320 | no data |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 40 | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | 267 mm |
| Width | 2-slot | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 896 MB ×2 |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 448 Bit ×2 |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz | 1008 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 448.0 GB/s | 112.9 GB/s ×2 |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 2x DVI |
| HDMI | + | - |
| G-SYNC support | + | - |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| VR Ready | + | no data |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_1) | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| CUDA | 7.5 | 1.3 |
| DLSS | + | - |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 9 July 2019 | 16 June 2009 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 896 MB |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 55 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 215 Watt | 289 Watt |
RTX 2070 Super has an age advantage of 10 years, a 814.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 358.3% more advanced lithography process, and 34.4% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 2070 Super and GeForce GTX 295 Single PCB. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
