Iris Plus Graphics G4 vs GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking173not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency22.32no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Generation 11.0 (2019−2021)
GPU code nameTU104BIce Lake GT2
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date2 April 2020 (5 years ago)29 May 2019 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2560384
Core clock speed1140 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1380 MHz1050 MHz
Number of transistors13,600 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)115 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate220.825.20
Floating-point processing power7.066 TFLOPS0.8064 TFLOPS
ROPs648
TMUs16024
Tensor Cores320no data
Ray Tracing Cores40no data
L1 Cache2.5 MBno data
L2 Cache4 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x1

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount8 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1750 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.2.1401.1.97
CUDA7.5-
DLSS+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 April 2020 29 May 2019
Chip lithography 12 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 115 Watt 15 Watt

RTX 2070 Super Mobile has an age advantage of 10 months.

Iris Plus Graphics G4, on the other hand, has a 20% more advanced lithography process, and 666.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile and Iris Plus Graphics G4. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G4
Iris Plus Graphics G4

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 415 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 9 votes

Rate Iris Plus Graphics G4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile or Iris Plus Graphics G4, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.