Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 vs GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Aggregated performance score
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q outperforms Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 by 261% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
General info
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in performance ranking | 127 | 414 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Value for money | 44.96 | no data |
Architecture | Turing (2018−2021) | Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) |
GPU code name | N18E-G2R | Tiger Lake Xe |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Release date | 2 April 2020 (4 years old) | 15 August 2020 (3 years old) |
Current price | $812 | no data |
Value for money
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Technical specs
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2560 | 96 |
Core clock speed | 930 MHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 1155 MHz | no data |
Number of transistors | 13,600 million | no data |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 10 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 80 Watt | no data |
Texture fill rate | 184.8 | no data |
Size and compatibility
Information on GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q and Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
Laptop size | large | no data |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | no data |
Supplementary power connectors | None | no data |
Memory
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | GDDR6 | DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | no data |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | no data |
Memory clock speed | 11000 MHz | no data |
Memory bandwidth | 352.0 GB/s | no data |
Shared memory | - | + |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | No outputs | no data |
G-SYNC support | + | no data |
Technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
VR Ready | + | no data |
Quick Sync | no data | + |
API support
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | DirectX 12_1 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | no data |
OpenGL | 4.6 | no data |
OpenCL | 1.2 | no data |
Vulkan | 1.2.140 | no data |
CUDA | 7.5 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q outperforms Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 by 261% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q outperforms Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 by 317% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | 106
+293%
| 27−30
−293%
|
1440p | 73
+306%
| 18−21
−306%
|
4K | 47
+292%
| 12−14
−292%
|
Performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 60−65
+288%
|
16−18
−288%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 99
+371%
|
21−24
−371%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 81
+286%
|
21−24
−286%
|
Battlefield 5 | 144
+324%
|
30−35
−324%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 125
+363%
|
27−30
−363%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 60−65
+288%
|
16−18
−288%
|
Far Cry 5 | 118
+372%
|
24−27
−372%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 98
+263%
|
27−30
−263%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 110−120
+220%
|
35−40
−220%
|
Hitman 3 | 110−120
+280%
|
30−33
−280%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 120
+500%
|
20−22
−500%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 89
+424%
|
16−18
−424%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 115
+448%
|
21−24
−448%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 96
+300%
|
24−27
−300%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 81
+286%
|
21−24
−286%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 70
+289%
|
18−20
−289%
|
Battlefield 5 | 136
+300%
|
30−35
−300%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 108
+300%
|
27−30
−300%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 60−65
+288%
|
16−18
−288%
|
Far Cry 5 | 111
+344%
|
24−27
−344%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 101
+274%
|
27−30
−274%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 110−120
+220%
|
35−40
−220%
|
Hitman 3 | 110−120
+280%
|
30−33
−280%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 100
+400%
|
20−22
−400%
|
Metro Exodus | 75
+400%
|
14−16
−400%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 51
+200%
|
16−18
−200%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 105
+400%
|
21−24
−400%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 142
+610%
|
20−22
−610%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 84
+300%
|
21−24
−300%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 62
+195%
|
21−24
−195%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 60
+275%
|
16−18
−275%
|
Battlefield 5 | 126
+271%
|
30−35
−271%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 60−65
+288%
|
16−18
−288%
|
Far Cry 5 | 104
+316%
|
24−27
−316%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 91
+237%
|
27−30
−237%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 110−120
+220%
|
35−40
−220%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 75
+275%
|
20−22
−275%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 59
+269%
|
16−18
−269%
|
1440p
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 72
+414%
|
14−16
−414%
|
Hitman 3 | 65−70
+261%
|
18−20
−261%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 50−55
+213%
|
16−18
−213%
|
Metro Exodus | 48
+500%
|
8−9
−500%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 33
+371%
|
7−8
−371%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 68
+423%
|
12−14
−423%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 47
+422%
|
9−10
−422%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 35−40
+290%
|
10−11
−290%
|
Battlefield 5 | 100
+488%
|
16−18
−488%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 27−30
+286%
|
7−8
−286%
|
Far Cry 5 | 65−70
+306%
|
16−18
−306%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 75
+369%
|
16−18
−369%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 75−80
+322%
|
18−20
−322%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 50−55
+317%
|
12−14
−317%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 30−35
+288%
|
8−9
−288%
|
4K
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 41
+486%
|
7−8
−486%
|
Hitman 3 | 35−40
+300%
|
9−10
−300%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 27−30
+238%
|
8−9
−238%
|
Metro Exodus | 28
+600%
|
4−5
−600%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 21
+320%
|
5−6
−320%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 36
+620%
|
5−6
−620%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 51
+538%
|
8−9
−538%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 32
+433%
|
6−7
−433%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 21−24
+267%
|
6−7
−267%
|
Battlefield 5 | 58
+625%
|
8−9
−625%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 10−12
+267%
|
3−4
−267%
|
Far Cry 5 | 30−35
+313%
|
8−9
−313%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 44
+300%
|
10−12
−300%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 50−55
+317%
|
12−14
−317%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 18−20
+350%
|
4−5
−350%
|
This is how RTX 2070 Super Max-Q and Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 compete in popular games:
1080p resolution:
- RTX 2070 Super Max-Q is 293% faster than Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
1440p resolution:
- RTX 2070 Super Max-Q is 306% faster than Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
4K resolution:
- RTX 2070 Super Max-Q is 292% faster than Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Battlefield 5, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 2070 Super Max-Q is 625% faster than the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7.
All in all, in popular games:
- Without exception, RTX 2070 Super Max-Q surpassed Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 in all 47 of our tests.
Advantages and disadvantages
Performance score | 35.95 | 9.97 |
Recency | 2 April 2020 | 15 August 2020 |
Chip lithography | 12 nm | 10 nm |
The GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.