Playstation 4 Slim GPU vs GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q Refresh

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameTU106BLiverpool 16nm
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date16 June 2020 (5 years ago)7 September 2016 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$399

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23041152
Core clock speed900 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speed1125 MHzno data
Number of transistors10,800 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)115 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate162.057.60
Floating-point processing power5.184 TFLOPS1.843 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs14472
Tensor Cores288no data
Ray Tracing Cores36no data
L1 Cache2.3 MBno data
L2 Cache4 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16IGP
Lengthno data288 mm
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1375 MHz1375 MHz
Memory bandwidth352.0 GB/s176.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)11.1*
Shader Model6.55.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.21.1
CUDA7.5-
DLSS+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 16 June 2020 7 September 2016
Chip lithography 12 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 115 Watt 75 Watt

RTX 2070 Max-Q Refresh has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 33.3% more advanced lithography process.

Playstation 4 Slim GPU, on the other hand, has 53.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q Refresh and Playstation 4 Slim GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q Refresh is a notebook graphics card while Playstation 4 Slim GPU is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q Refresh
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q Refresh
AMD Playstation 4 Slim GPU
Playstation 4 Slim GPU

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 11 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q Refresh on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 186 votes

Rate Playstation 4 Slim GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q Refresh or Playstation 4 Slim GPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.