Radeon HD 6250 vs GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile Refresh
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 1432 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 0.89 |
| Architecture | Turing (2018−2022) | TeraScale 2 (2009−2015) |
| GPU code name | TU106B | Cedar |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 29 January 2019 (6 years ago) | 31 January 2011 (14 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1920 | 80 |
| Core clock speed | 1005 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 10,800 million | 292 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 19 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 187.2 | 5.200 |
| Floating-point processing power | 5.99 TFLOPS | 0.104 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 48 | 4 |
| TMUs | 120 | 8 |
| Tensor Cores | 240 | no data |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 30 | no data |
| L1 Cache | 1.9 MB | 16 KB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 128 KB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 168 mm |
| Width | no data | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1375 MHz | 500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 264.0 GB/s | 8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI |
| HDMI | - | + |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 11.2 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | N/A |
| CUDA | 7.5 | - |
| DLSS | + | - |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 29 January 2019 | 31 January 2011 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 512 MB |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 19 Watt |
RTX 2060 Mobile Refresh has an age advantage of 7 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.
HD 6250, on the other hand, has 242.1% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile Refresh and Radeon HD 6250. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile Refresh is a notebook graphics card while Radeon HD 6250 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
