ATI All-In-Wonder 9800 PRO vs GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q Refresh

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Rage 8 (2002−2007)
GPU code nameTU106BR350
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date29 January 2019 (5 years ago)16 June 2003 (21 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1920no data
Core clock speed960 MHz378 MHz
Boost clock speed1200 MHzno data
Number of transistors10,800 million117 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)115 Wattno data
Texture fill rate144.03.024
Floating-point processing power4.608 TFLOPSno data
ROPs488
TMUs1208
Tensor Cores240no data
Ray Tracing Cores30no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6DDR
Maximum RAM amount6 GB128 MB
Memory bus width192 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1353 MHz338 MHz
Memory bandwidth259.8 GB/s21.63 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 2x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)9.0 (9_0)
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2.140N/A
CUDA7.5-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 January 2019 16 June 2003
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 12 nm 150 nm

RTX 2060 Max-Q Refresh has an age advantage of 15 years, a 4700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1150% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q Refresh and All-In-Wonder 9800 PRO. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q Refresh is a notebook card while All-In-Wonder 9800 PRO is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q Refresh
GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q Refresh
ATI All-In-Wonder 9800 PRO
All-In-Wonder 9800 PRO

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 57 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q Refresh on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate All-In-Wonder 9800 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.