Radeon 780M vs GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile and Radeon 780M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RTX 2050 Mobile
2021
4 GB GDDR6, 45 Watt
18.64
+1.8%

RTX 2050 Mobile outperforms 780M by a minimal 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking294298
Place by popularity1747
Power efficiency28.7984.85
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGA107Hawx Point
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date17 December 2021 (2 years ago)6 December 2023 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048768
Core clock speed1185 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speed1477 MHz2700 MHz
Number of transistorsno data25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate94.53129.6
Floating-point processing power6.05 TFLOPS8.294 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs6448
Tensor Cores256no data
Ray Tracing Cores3212

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1750 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth112.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4aPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.1
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.6-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 2050 Mobile 18.64
+1.8%
Radeon 780M 18.31

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 2050 Mobile 12340
Radeon 780M 12785
+3.6%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RTX 2050 Mobile 46821
+12.5%
Radeon 780M 41622

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX 2050 Mobile 8946
+12.1%
Radeon 780M 7977

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX 2050 Mobile 58257
+21.1%
Radeon 780M 48105

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

RTX 2050 Mobile 3199
+13%
Radeon 780M 2832

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD43
+19.4%
36
−19.4%
1440p36
+80%
20
−80%
4K32
+113%
15
−113%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 49
+25.6%
39
−25.6%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+2.4%
40−45
−2.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 42
+40%
30−33
−40%
Battlefield 5 60−65
+1.7%
60−65
−1.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+2.7%
35−40
−2.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 42
+35.5%
31
−35.5%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+2.3%
40−45
−2.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+2%
45−50
−2%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+1.7%
110−120
−1.7%
Hitman 3 44
+25.7%
35−40
−25.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 90−95
+1.1%
90−95
−1.1%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+1.6%
60−65
−1.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+2%
45−50
−2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 60−65
+1.7%
60−65
−1.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
+1.1%
85−90
−1.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+2.4%
40−45
−2.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21
−42.9%
30−33
+42.9%
Battlefield 5 60−65
+1.7%
60−65
−1.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+2.7%
35−40
−2.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 30
+25%
24
−25%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+2.3%
40−45
−2.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+2%
45−50
−2%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+1.7%
110−120
−1.7%
Hitman 3 43
+22.9%
35−40
−22.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 90−95
+1.1%
90−95
−1.1%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+1.6%
60−65
−1.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+2%
45−50
−2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 62
+14.8%
54
−14.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
+1.1%
85−90
−1.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+2.4%
40−45
−2.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7
−329%
30−33
+329%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+2.7%
35−40
−2.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 25
+8.7%
23
−8.7%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+2.3%
40−45
−2.3%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+1.7%
110−120
−1.7%
Hitman 3 39
+11.4%
35−40
−11.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 90−95
+71.7%
53
−71.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55
+19.6%
46
−19.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 33
+13.8%
29
−13.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 18
+0%
18
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+2%
45−50
−2%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+2.9%
35−40
−2.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+5%
20−22
−5%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+4.8%
21−24
−4.8%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+3%
100−105
−3%
Hitman 3 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+2.7%
35−40
−2.7%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 47
+46.9%
32
−46.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+5%
20
−5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
+0.9%
110−120
−0.9%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+3.3%
30−33
−3.3%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Hitman 3 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 95−100
+2.1%
90−95
−2.1%
Metro Exodus 20−22
+5.3%
18−20
−5.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+26.7%
15
−26.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 20−22
+17.6%
17
−17.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

This is how RTX 2050 Mobile and Radeon 780M compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2050 Mobile is 19% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2050 Mobile is 80% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2050 Mobile is 113% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 2050 Mobile is 72% faster.
  • in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Radeon 780M is 329% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 2050 Mobile is ahead in 53 tests (74%)
  • Radeon 780M is ahead in 2 tests (3%)
  • there's a draw in 17 tests (24%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 18.64 18.31
Recency 17 December 2021 6 December 2023
Chip lithography 8 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 15 Watt

RTX 2050 Mobile has a 1.8% higher aggregate performance score.

Radeon 780M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile and Radeon 780M.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
AMD Radeon 780M
Radeon 780M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 2060 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 1472 votes

Rate Radeon 780M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.