GMA 900 vs GeForce PCX 5300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1561not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRankine (2003−2005)Generation 3.0 (2005)
GPU code nameNV37Alviso
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date17 February 2004 (21 years ago)2005 (20 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed250 MHz333 MHz
Number of transistors45 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology150 nm130 nm
Texture fill rate1.0001.332
ROPs44
TMUs44

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16FSB
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount128 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed200 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0a9.0c
Shader Modelno data3.0
OpenGL1.5 (2.1)1.4
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 150 nm 130 nm

GMA 900 has a 15.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce PCX 5300 and GMA 900. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce PCX 5300 is a desktop graphics card while GMA 900 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce PCX 5300
GeForce PCX 5300
Intel GMA 900
GMA 900

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 14 votes

Rate GeForce PCX 5300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 30 votes

Rate GMA 900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce PCX 5300 or GMA 900, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.