Quadro GV100 vs GeForce PCX 4300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot rated47
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data4.72
ArchitectureCelsius (1999−2005)Volta (2017−2020)
GPU code nameNV19GV100
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date19 February 2004 (20 years ago)27 March 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$8,999
Current priceno data$5183 (0.6x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data5120
Core clock speed250 MHz1132 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1627 MHz
Number of transistors29 million21,100 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data250 Watt
Texture fill rate0.5520.6
Floating-point performanceno data14,817 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRHBM2
Maximum RAM amount64 MB32 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed332 MHz1696 MHz
Memory bandwidth2.656 GB/s868.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video4x DisplayPort

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.012 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGL1.34.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDAno data7.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 February 2004 27 March 2018
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 32 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 12 nm

We couldn't decide between GeForce PCX 4300 and Quadro GV100. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce PCX 4300 is a desktop card while Quadro GV100 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce PCX 4300
GeForce PCX 4300
NVIDIA Quadro GV100
Quadro GV100

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate GeForce PCX 4300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 52 votes

Rate Quadro GV100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.