RTX A1000 vs GeForce MX450 30.5W 8Gbps

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated251
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data39.73
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameTU117GA107
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date25 August 2020 (5 years ago)16 April 2024 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8962304
Core clock speed1035 MHz727 MHz
Boost clock speed1275 MHz1462 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 million8,700 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)31 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate71.40105.3
Floating-point processing power2.285 TFLOPS6.737 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs5672
Tensor Coresno data72
Ray Tracing Coresno data18
L1 Cache896 KB2.3 MB
L2 Cache512 KB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x4PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data163 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth64 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.21.3
CUDA7.58.6
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 August 2020 16 April 2024
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 31 Watt 50 Watt

MX450 30.5W 8Gbps has 61.3% lower power consumption.

RTX A1000, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 50% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce MX450 30.5W 8Gbps and RTX A1000. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce MX450 30.5W 8Gbps is a notebook graphics card while RTX A1000 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce MX450 30.5W 8Gbps
GeForce MX450 30.5W 8Gbps
NVIDIA RTX A1000
RTX A1000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 12 votes

Rate GeForce MX450 30.5W 8Gbps on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 62 votes

Rate RTX A1000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce MX450 30.5W 8Gbps or RTX A1000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.