Arc Graphics 64EU vs GeForce MX250

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking623not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency43.37no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Xe2-LPG (2024)
GPU code nameGP108BArrow Lake
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date20 February 2019 (6 years ago)24 October 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384512
Core clock speed937 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1038 MHz1900 MHz
Number of transistors1,800 million17,800 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate24.9160.80
Floating-point processing power0.7972 TFLOPS1.946 TFLOPS
ROPs1616
TMUs2432

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x4Ring Bus
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1502 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth48.06 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentMotherboard Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.7 (6.4)6.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA6.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 February 2019 24 October 2024
Chip lithography 14 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 65 Watt

GeForce MX250 has 550% lower power consumption.

Arc Graphics 64EU, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce MX250 and Arc Graphics 64EU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce MX250 is a notebook graphics card while Arc Graphics 64EU is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce MX250
GeForce MX250
Intel Arc Graphics 64EU
Arc Graphics 64EU

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 1662 votes

Rate GeForce MX250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Arc Graphics 64EU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce MX250 or Arc Graphics 64EU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.