P106M vs GeForce MX230

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking640not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency33.11no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameGP108GP106
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date21 February 2019 (5 years ago)23 January 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2561152
Core clock speed1519 MHz1291 MHz
Boost clock speed1582 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,800 million4,400 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate25.3192.95
Floating-point processing power0.81 TFLOPS2.974 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs1672

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz1502 MHz
Memory bandwidth48.06 GB/s96.13 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2
CUDA+6.1

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 75 Watt

GeForce MX230 has a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 650% lower power consumption.

P106M, on the other hand, has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between GeForce MX230 and P106M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce MX230 is a notebook graphics card while P106M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce MX230
GeForce MX230
NVIDIA P106M
P106M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 1374 votes

Rate GeForce MX230 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3 votes

Rate P106M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.