Tesla V100S PCIe 32 GB vs GeForce MX150

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking588not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency40.99no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Volta (2017−2020)
GPU code nameGP108GV100
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date17 May 2017 (7 years ago)26 November 2019 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3845120
Core clock speed937 MHz1245 MHz
Boost clock speed1038 MHz1597 MHz
Number of transistors1,800 million21,100 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate24.91511.0
Floating-point processing power0.7972 TFLOPS16.35 TFLOPS
ROPs16128
TMUs24320
Tensor Coresno data640

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2
Maximum RAM amount4 GB32 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed1253 MHz1106 MHz
Memory bandwidth40.1 GB/s1,133 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA6.17.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 May 2017 26 November 2019
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 32 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 250 Watt

GeForce MX150 has 2400% lower power consumption.

Tesla V100S PCIe 32 GB, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce MX150 and Tesla V100S PCIe 32 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce MX150 is a notebook card while Tesla V100S PCIe 32 GB is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce MX150
GeForce MX150
NVIDIA Tesla V100S PCIe 32 GB
Tesla V100S PCIe 32 GB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 1616 votes

Rate GeForce MX150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 14 votes

Rate Tesla V100S PCIe 32 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.