Tesla P100 SXM2 vs GeForce MX150

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking659not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency41.40no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameGP108GP100
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date17 May 2017 (8 years ago)5 April 2016 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3843584
Core clock speed937 MHz1328 MHz
Boost clock speed1038 MHz1480 MHz
Number of transistors1,800 million15,300 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate24.91331.5
Floating-point processing power0.7972 TFLOPS10.61 TFLOPS
ROPs1696
TMUs24224
L1 Cache144 KB1.3 MB
L2 Cache512 KB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2
Maximum RAM amount4 GB16 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed1253 MHz704 MHz
Memory bandwidth40.1 GB/s720.9 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA6.16.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 May 2017 5 April 2016
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 300 Watt

GeForce MX150 has an age advantage of 1 year, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 2900% lower power consumption.

Tesla P100 SXM2, on the other hand, has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between GeForce MX150 and Tesla P100 SXM2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce MX150 is a notebook graphics card while Tesla P100 SXM2 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce MX150
GeForce MX150
NVIDIA Tesla P100 SXM2
Tesla P100 SXM2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 1772 votes

Rate GeForce MX150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 53 votes

Rate Tesla P100 SXM2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce MX150 or Tesla P100 SXM2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.