GeForce 6200 X2 PCI vs MX150

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking588not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency41.05no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameGP108NV44 A2
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date17 May 2017 (7 years ago)16 January 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384no data
Core clock speed937 MHz280 MHz
Boost clock speed1038 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,800 million75 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm110 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Wattno data
Texture fill rate24.911.120
Floating-point processing power0.7972 TFLOPSno data
ROPs162
TMUs244

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCI
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR2
Maximum RAM amount4 GB256 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1253 MHz200 MHz
Memory bandwidth40.1 GB/s3.2 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DMS-59

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model6.43.0
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA6.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 May 2017 16 January 2008
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 110 nm

GeForce MX150 has an age advantage of 9 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 685.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce MX150 and GeForce 6200 X2 PCI. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce MX150 is a notebook card while GeForce 6200 X2 PCI is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce MX150
GeForce MX150
NVIDIA GeForce 6200 X2 PCI
GeForce 6200 X2 PCI

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 1617 votes

Rate GeForce MX150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce 6200 X2 PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.