Quadro RTX 8200 vs GeForce MX110
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | 706 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | 96 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | Maxwell (2014−2018) | Ampere (2020−2024) |
| GPU code name | N16V-GMR1 | GA102 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 1 January 2018 (6 years ago) | no data |
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 256 | 7552 |
| Core clock speed | 965 MHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 993 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Number of transistors | no data | 40,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 260 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 23.83 | 708.0 |
| Floating-point performance | 0.7626 gflops | 22.66 gflops |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 267 mm |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR3, GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 48 GB |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 14000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 40.1 GB/s | 672.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Optimus | + | - |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | no data |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | no data |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | - |
| CUDA | + | - |
Pros & cons summary
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 48 GB |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 260 Watt |
GeForce MX110 has 766.7% lower power consumption.
RTX 8200, on the other hand, has a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between GeForce MX110 and Quadro RTX 8200. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that GeForce MX110 is a notebook card while Quadro RTX 8200 is a workstation one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
