ATI Radeon X1050 AGP vs GeForce Go 7950 GTX SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureG7x (2005−2006)Rage 8 (2002−2007)
GPU code nameG71MRV350
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date12 October 2006 (19 years ago)7 December 2006 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores64no data
Core clock speed16 MHz250 MHz
Boost clock speed575 MHzno data
Number of transistors556 Million60 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)90 Watt24 Watt
Texture fill rateno data1.000
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataAGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount2x512 MB128 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz200 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data6.4 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXGDDR39.0 (9_0)
OpenGLno data2.0
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 October 2006 7 December 2006
Chip lithography 90 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 90 Watt 24 Watt

Go 7950 GTX SLI has a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.

ATI X1050 AGP, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 month, and 275% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce Go 7950 GTX SLI and Radeon X1050 AGP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce Go 7950 GTX SLI is a notebook graphics card while Radeon X1050 AGP is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce Go 7950 GTX SLI
GeForce Go 7950 GTX SLI
ATI Radeon X1050 AGP
Radeon X1050 AGP

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1 2 votes

Rate GeForce Go 7950 GTX SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 3 votes

Rate Radeon X1050 AGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce Go 7950 GTX SLI or Radeon X1050 AGP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.