Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid vs GeForce Go 7950 GTX SLI

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureG7x (2005−2006)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameG71MVega 10
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date12 October 2006 (19 years ago)8 August 2017 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores644096
Core clock speed16 MHz1406 MHz
Boost clock speed575 MHz1677 MHz
Number of transistors556 Millionno data
Manufacturing process technology90 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)90 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rateno data429.3
ROPsno data64
TMUsno data256

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3HBM2
Maximum RAM amount2x512 MB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz1890 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data483.8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXGDDR312.0
Shader Modelno data5.0
OpenGLno data4.5
OpenCLno data2.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 October 2006 8 August 2017
Chip lithography 90 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 90 Watt 225 Watt

Go 7950 GTX SLI has 150% lower power consumption.

RX Vega 64 Liquid, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce Go 7950 GTX SLI and Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce Go 7950 GTX SLI is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce Go 7950 GTX SLI
GeForce Go 7950 GTX SLI
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid
Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1 2 votes

Rate GeForce Go 7950 GTX SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 28 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce Go 7950 GTX SLI or Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.