Radeon RX 5300 OEM vs GeForce Go 7950 GTX SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureG7x (2005−2006)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameG71MNavi 14
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date12 October 2006 (19 years ago)28 May 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores64768
Core clock speed16 MHz1375 MHz
Boost clock speed575 MHz1645 MHz
Number of transistors556 Million6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)90 Watt135 Watt
Texture fill rateno data78.96
Floating-point processing powerno data2.527 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data48
L2 Cacheno data2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2x512 MB3 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data84 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXGDDR312 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 October 2006 28 May 2020
Chip lithography 90 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 90 Watt 135 Watt

Go 7950 GTX SLI has 50% lower power consumption.

RX 5300 OEM, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 13 years, and a 1185.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce Go 7950 GTX SLI and Radeon RX 5300 OEM. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce Go 7950 GTX SLI is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX 5300 OEM is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce Go 7950 GTX SLI
GeForce Go 7950 GTX SLI
AMD Radeon RX 5300 OEM
Radeon RX 5300 OEM

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1 2 votes

Rate GeForce Go 7950 GTX SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 5 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5300 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce Go 7950 GTX SLI or Radeon RX 5300 OEM, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.