Radeon R7 A360 vs GeForce Go 7900 SE

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1025
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameG73Meso
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date18 April 2006 (19 years ago)5 May 2015 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data384
Core clock speed350 MHz1100 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1125 MHz
Number of transistors177 million1,550 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Wattno data
Texture fill rate4.20027.00
Floating-point processing powerno data0.864 TFLOPS
ROPs88
TMUs1224
L1 Cacheno data96 KB
L2 Cacheno data128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR3
Maximum RAM amount256 MB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed333 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth21.31 GB/s14.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (12_0)
Shader Model3.06.0
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 April 2006 5 May 2015
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 28 nm

R7 A360 has an age advantage of 9 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce Go 7900 SE and Radeon R7 A360. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce Go 7900 SE
GeForce Go 7900 SE
AMD Radeon R7 A360
Radeon R7 A360

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce Go 7900 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 4 votes

Rate Radeon R7 A360 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce Go 7900 SE or Radeon R7 A360, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.