Radeon Pro VII vs GeForce Go 7900 SE

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot rated149
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data10.39
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)GCN 5.1 (2018−2021)
GPU code nameG73Vega 20
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date18 April 2006 (18 years ago)13 May 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,899
Current priceno data$2378 (1.3x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data3840
Core clock speed350 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1700 MHz
Number of transistors177 million13,230 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate4.200408.0

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data305 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3HBM2
Maximum RAM amount256 MB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed666 MHz2 GB/s
Memory bandwidth21.31 GB/s1024 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (12_1)
Shader Model3.06.7
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A2.1
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 April 2006 13 May 2020
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 16 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 250 Watt

We couldn't decide between GeForce Go 7900 SE and Radeon Pro VII. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce Go 7900 SE is a desktop card while Radeon Pro VII is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce Go 7900 SE
GeForce Go 7900 SE
AMD Radeon Pro VII
Radeon Pro VII

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce Go 7900 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1546 votes

Rate Radeon Pro VII on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.