Quadro P520 vs GeForce Go 7900 SE

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated686
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data20.62
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameG73GP108
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date18 April 2006 (19 years ago)23 May 2019 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data384
Core clock speed350 MHz1303 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1493 MHz
Number of transistors177 million1,800 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt18 Watt
Texture fill rate4.20035.83
Floating-point processing powerno data1.147 TFLOPS
ROPs816
TMUs1224
L1 Cacheno data144 KB
L2 Cacheno data512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount256 MB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed333 MHz1502 MHz
Memory bandwidth21.31 GB/s48.06 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (12_1)
Shader Model3.06.4
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA-6.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 April 2006 23 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 18 Watt

Quadro P520 has an age advantage of 13 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 543% more advanced lithography process, and 11% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce Go 7900 SE and Quadro P520. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce Go 7900 SE is a notebook graphics card while Quadro P520 is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce Go 7900 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 113 votes

Rate Quadro P520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce Go 7900 SE or Quadro P520, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.