Matrox G450 x4 MMS vs GeForce Go 7900 GTX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1171not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.07no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)G400 (1999−2002)
GPU code nameG71Condor
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date18 April 2006 (18 years ago)1 January 2001 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32no data
Core clock speed500 MHz125 MHz
Boost clock speed500 MHzno data
Number of transistors278 million10 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Wattno data
Texture fill rate12.000.25
ROPs162
TMUs242

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCI
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount512 MB32 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed600 MHz332 MBps
Memory bandwidth38.4 GB/s2.656 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)6.0
Shader Model3.0no data
OpenGL2.1None
OpenCLN/ANone
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 April 2006 1 January 2001
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 32 MB
Chip lithography 90 nm 180 nm

Go 7900 GTX has an age advantage of 5 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce Go 7900 GTX and Matrox G450 x4 MMS. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce Go 7900 GTX is a notebook card while Matrox G450 x4 MMS is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce Go 7900 GTX
GeForce Go 7900 GTX
Matrox G450 x4 MMS
G450 x4 MMS

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 1 vote

Rate GeForce Go 7900 GTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.1 11 votes

Rate Matrox G450 x4 MMS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.