Arc 7 A780 vs GeForce Go 7900 GTX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1239not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.11no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameG71DG2-512
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date18 April 2006 (19 years ago)2022 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores324096
Core clock speed500 MHzno data
Boost clock speed500 MHz2200 MHz
Number of transistors278 million21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt200 Watt
Texture fill rate12.00563.2
Floating-point processing powerno data18.02 TFLOPS
ROPs16128
TMUs24256

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount512 MB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed600 MHz17.5 GB/s
Memory bandwidth38.4 GB/s559.6 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model3.06.6
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 16 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 200 Watt

Go 7900 GTX has 344.4% lower power consumption.

Arc 7 A780, on the other hand, has a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1400% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce Go 7900 GTX and Arc 7 A780. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce Go 7900 GTX is a notebook graphics card while Arc 7 A780 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce Go 7900 GTX
GeForce Go 7900 GTX
Intel Arc 7 A780
Arc 7 A780

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 2 votes

Rate GeForce Go 7900 GTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 36 votes

Rate Arc 7 A780 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce Go 7900 GTX or Arc 7 A780, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.