Radeon Pro W6800 vs GeForce Go 7900 GTX SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated77
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data10.66
Power efficiencyno data14.85
ArchitectureG7x (2005−2006)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameG71MNavi 21
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date12 October 2006 (19 years ago)8 June 2021 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,249

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores643840
Core clock speed16 MHz2075 MHz
Boost clock speed500 MHz2320 MHz
Number of transistors556 Million26,800 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)90 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rateno data556.8
Floating-point processing powerno data17.82 TFLOPS
ROPsno data96
TMUsno data240
Ray Tracing Coresno data60
L0 Cacheno data960 KB
L1 Cacheno data768 KB
L2 Cacheno data4 MB
L3 Cacheno data128 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2x512 MB32 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data512.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data6x mini-DisplayPort

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXGDDR312 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.1
Vulkan-1.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 October 2006 8 June 2021
Chip lithography 90 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 90 Watt 250 Watt

Go 7900 GTX SLI has 178% lower power consumption.

Pro W6800, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 14 years, and a 1186% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce Go 7900 GTX SLI and Radeon Pro W6800. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce Go 7900 GTX SLI is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro W6800 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce Go 7900 GTX SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 87 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W6800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce Go 7900 GTX SLI or Radeon Pro W6800, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.