Radeon Pro 5300 vs GeForce Go 7900 GTX SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated355
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data15.36
ArchitectureG7x (2005−2006)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameG71MNavi 14
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date12 October 2006 (19 years ago)4 August 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores641280
Core clock speed16 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed500 MHz1650 MHz
Number of transistors556 Million6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)90 Watt85 Watt
Texture fill rateno data132.0
Floating-point processing powerno data4.224 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data80
L2 Cacheno data2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2x512 MB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data224.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXGDDR312 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-1.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 October 2006 4 August 2020
Chip lithography 90 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 90 Watt 85 Watt

Pro 5300 has an age advantage of 13 years, a 1186% more advanced lithography process, and 6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce Go 7900 GTX SLI and Radeon Pro 5300. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce Go 7900 GTX SLI is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro 5300 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce Go 7900 GTX SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 101 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce Go 7900 GTX SLI or Radeon Pro 5300, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.