Radeon PRO W7900 vs GeForce Go 7900 GTX SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated26
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data7.38
Power efficiencyno data17.36
ArchitectureG7x (2005−2006)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)
GPU code nameG71MNavi 31
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date12 October 2006 (19 years ago)13 April 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$3,999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores646144
Core clock speed16 MHz1855 MHz
Boost clock speed500 MHz2495 MHz
Number of transistors556 Million57,700 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)90 Watt295 Watt
Texture fill rateno data958.1
Floating-point processing powerno data61.32 TFLOPS
ROPsno data192
TMUsno data384
Ray Tracing Coresno data96
L0 Cacheno data3 MB
L1 Cacheno data3 MB
L2 Cacheno data6 MB
L3 Cacheno data96 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data280 mm
Widthno data3-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2x512 MB48 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data864.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data3x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXGDDR312 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.2
Vulkan-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 October 2006 13 April 2023
Chip lithography 90 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 90 Watt 295 Watt

Go 7900 GTX SLI has 228% lower power consumption.

PRO W7900, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 16 years, and a 1700% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce Go 7900 GTX SLI and Radeon PRO W7900. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce Go 7900 GTX SLI is a notebook graphics card while Radeon PRO W7900 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce Go 7900 GTX SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 87 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce Go 7900 GTX SLI or Radeon PRO W7900, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.