ATI Radeon 9000 vs GeForce Go 7900 GTX SLI

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1581
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.03
ArchitectureG7x (2005−2006)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameG71MRV250
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date12 October 2006 (19 years ago)1 July 2002 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores64no data
Core clock speed16 MHz250 MHz
Boost clock speed500 MHzno data
Number of transistors556 Million36 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)90 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rateno data1.000
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataAGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount2x512 MB64 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz200 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data6.4 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXGDDR38.1
OpenGLno data1.4
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 October 2006 1 July 2002
Chip lithography 90 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 90 Watt 28 Watt

Go 7900 GTX SLI has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 67% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 9000, on the other hand, has 221% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce Go 7900 GTX SLI and Radeon 9000. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce Go 7900 GTX SLI is a notebook graphics card while Radeon 9000 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce Go 7900 GTX SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 36 votes

Rate Radeon 9000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce Go 7900 GTX SLI or Radeon 9000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.