RTX A3000 Mobile vs GeForce Go 7900 GTX SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated202
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data33.41
ArchitectureG7x (2005−2006)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameG71MGA104
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date12 October 2006 (18 years ago)12 April 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores644096
Core clock speed16 MHz600 MHz
Boost clock speed500 MHz1230 MHz
Number of transistors556 Million17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)90 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rateno data157.4
Floating-point processing powerno data10.08 TFLOPS
ROPsno data64
TMUsno data128
Tensor Coresno data128
Ray Tracing Coresno data32
L1 Cacheno data4 MB
L2 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2x512 MB6 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz1375 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data264.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXGDDR312 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 October 2006 12 April 2021
Chip lithography 90 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 90 Watt 70 Watt

RTX A3000 Mobile has an age advantage of 14 years, a 1025% more advanced lithography process, and 28.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce Go 7900 GTX SLI and RTX A3000 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce Go 7900 GTX SLI is a notebook graphics card while RTX A3000 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce Go 7900 GTX SLI
GeForce Go 7900 GTX SLI
NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile
RTX A3000 Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce Go 7900 GTX SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 143 votes

Rate RTX A3000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce Go 7900 GTX SLI or RTX A3000 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.