Tesla C2090 vs GeForce Go 7900 GS

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1321not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.62no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameG71GF110
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date18 April 2006 (19 years ago)25 July 2011 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores27512
Core clock speed375 MHz651 MHz
Boost clock speed375 MHzno data
Number of transistors278 million3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate7.50041.66
Floating-point processing powerno data1.332 TFLOPS
ROPs1648
TMUs2064
L1 Cacheno data1 MB
L2 Cacheno data768 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-IIPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data248 mm
Widthno data2-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount512 MB6 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz924 MHz
Memory bandwidth32 GB/s177.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (11_0)
Shader Model3.05.1
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-2.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 April 2006 25 July 2011
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 6 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 250 Watt

Go 7900 GS has 1150% lower power consumption.

Tesla C2090, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 125% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce Go 7900 GS and Tesla C2090. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce Go 7900 GS is a notebook graphics card while Tesla C2090 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 3 votes

Rate GeForce Go 7900 GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.7 3 votes

Rate Tesla C2090 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce Go 7900 GS or Tesla C2090, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.