Radeon R7 350 640SP vs GeForce Go 7900 GS SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureG7x (2005−2006)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameG71MCape Verde
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 June 2006 (19 years ago)7 January 2019 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores54640
Core clock speed14 MHz925 MHz
Boost clock speed375 MHzno data
Number of transistors556 Million1,500 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt55 Watt
Texture fill rateno data37.00
Floating-point processing powerno data1.184 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data40
L1 Cacheno data160 KB
L2 Cacheno data256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz1125 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data72 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXGDDR312 (11_1)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 June 2006 7 January 2019
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 55 Watt

Go 7900 GS SLI has 37.5% lower power consumption.

R7 350 640SP, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 12 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce Go 7900 GS SLI and Radeon R7 350 640SP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce Go 7900 GS SLI is a notebook graphics card while Radeon R7 350 640SP is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce Go 7900 GS SLI
GeForce Go 7900 GS SLI
AMD Radeon R7 350 640SP
Radeon R7 350 640SP

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce Go 7900 GS SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 1 vote

Rate Radeon R7 350 640SP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce Go 7900 GS SLI or Radeon R7 350 640SP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.