Radeon R2 Mobile Graphics vs GeForce Go 7800

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1387not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.59no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameG70Beema
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date3 March 2006 (19 years ago)28 January 2015 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores22128
Core clock speed400 MHz497 MHz
Boost clock speed400 MHz300 MHz
Number of transistors302 million930 million
Manufacturing process technology110 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate6.4003.976
Floating-point processing powerno data0.1272 TFLOPS
ROPs164
TMUs168

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16IGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount256 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed550 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth35.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (12_0)
Shader Model3.06.3
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 March 2006 28 January 2015
Chip lithography 110 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 100 Watt

Go 7800 has 185.7% lower power consumption.

R2 Mobile Graphics, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, and a 292.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce Go 7800 and Radeon R2 Mobile Graphics. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce Go 7800
GeForce Go 7800
AMD Radeon R2 Mobile Graphics
Radeon R2 Mobile Graphics

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.5 2 votes

Rate GeForce Go 7800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 61 votes

Rate Radeon R2 Mobile Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce Go 7800 or Radeon R2 Mobile Graphics, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.