ATI Radeon X1300 PRO AGP vs GeForce Go 6800

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1416not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.43no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)R500 (2005−2007)
GPU code nameNV41RV515
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date8 November 2004 (21 years ago)1 October 2005 (20 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17no data
Core clock speed300 MHz600 MHz
Boost clock speed300 MHzno data
Number of transistors190 million107 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt31 Watt
Texture fill rate3.6002.400
ROPs84
TMUs124

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-IIIAGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount256 MB256 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed550 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth35.2 GB/s12.8 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model3.03.0
OpenGL2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)2.0
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 November 2004 1 October 2005
Chip lithography 130 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 31 Watt

ATI X1300 PRO AGP has an age advantage of 10 months, a 44.4% more advanced lithography process, and 45.2% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce Go 6800 and Radeon X1300 PRO AGP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce Go 6800 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon X1300 PRO AGP is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce Go 6800
GeForce Go 6800
ATI Radeon X1300 PRO AGP
Radeon X1300 PRO AGP

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate GeForce Go 6800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1 vote

Rate Radeon X1300 PRO AGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce Go 6800 or Radeon X1300 PRO AGP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.