ATI Radeon 9700 PRO X4 vs GeForce Go 6800

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1426not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.43no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Rage 8 (2002−2007)
GPU code nameNV41R300
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date8 November 2004 (21 years ago)1 July 2002 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17no data
Core clock speed300 MHz325 MHz
Boost clock speed300 MHzno data
Number of transistors190 million110 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Wattno data
Texture fill rate3.6002.600 ×4
ROPs88 ×4
TMUs128 ×4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-IIIPCI
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount256 MB128 MB ×4
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit ×4
Memory clock speed550 MHz310 MHz
Memory bandwidth35.2 GB/s19.84 GB/s ×4
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent4x DVI

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)9.0 (9_0)
Shader Model3.0no data
OpenGL2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)2.0
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 November 2004 1 July 2002
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 128 MB
Chip lithography 130 nm 150 nm

Go 6800 has an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 15% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce Go 6800 and Radeon 9700 PRO X4. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce Go 6800 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon 9700 PRO X4 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate GeForce Go 6800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Radeon 9700 PRO X4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce Go 6800 or Radeon 9700 PRO X4, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.