Riva 128 vs GeForce Go 6800 Ultra

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1362not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.28no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)no data
GPU code nameNV41NV3
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date24 February 2005 (20 years ago)1 April 1997 (28 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17no data
Core clock speed450 MHz100 MHz
Boost clock speed450 MHzno data
Number of transistors190 million4 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm350 nm
Power consumption (TDP)89 Watt4 Watt
Texture fill rate5.4000.1
ROPs81
TMUs121

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16AGP 2x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3SDR
Maximum RAM amount256 MB4 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed600 MHz100 MHz
Memory bandwidth38.4 GB/s1.6 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x VGA, 1x DB13W3

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)5.0
Shader Model3.0no data
OpenGL2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)1.0
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 24 February 2005 1 April 1997
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 4 MB
Chip lithography 130 nm 350 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 89 Watt 4 Watt

Go 6800 Ultra has an age advantage of 7 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 169.2% more advanced lithography process.

Riva 128, on the other hand, has 2125% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce Go 6800 Ultra and Riva 128. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce Go 6800 Ultra is a notebook graphics card while Riva 128 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce Go 6800 Ultra
GeForce Go 6800 Ultra
NVIDIA Riva 128
Riva 128

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 4 votes

Rate GeForce Go 6800 Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 59 votes

Rate Riva 128 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce Go 6800 Ultra or Riva 128, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.