Radeon RX Vega 24 Mobile vs GeForce Go 6800 Ultra

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1373not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.29no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameNV41Fenghuang
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date24 February 2005 (21 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17no data
Core clock speed450 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed450 MHz1190 MHz
Number of transistors190 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology130 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)89 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate5.400no data
ROPs8no data
TMUs12no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16IGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3no data
Maximum RAM amount256 MBno data
Memory bus width256 Bitno data
Memory clock speed600 MHz2400 MHz
Memory bandwidth38.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12.0 (12_1)
Shader Model3.0no data
OpenGL2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)4.6
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 130 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 89 Watt 100 Watt

Go 6800 Ultra has 12% lower power consumption.

RX Vega 24 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 829% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce Go 6800 Ultra and Radeon RX Vega 24 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 4 votes

Rate GeForce Go 6800 Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 6 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 24 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce Go 6800 Ultra or Radeon RX Vega 24 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.