Radeon Graphics 384SP vs GeForce Go 6800 Ultra

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1373not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.29no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameNV41Cezanne
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date24 February 2005 (21 years ago)13 April 2021 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17384
Core clock speed450 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed450 MHz1700 MHz
Number of transistors190 million9,800 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)89 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate5.40040.80
Floating-point processing powerno data1.306 TFLOPS
ROPs88
TMUs1224

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16IGP
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount256 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed600 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth38.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (12_1)
Shader Model3.06.7 (6.4)
OpenGL2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)4.6
OpenCLN/A2.1
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 24 February 2005 13 April 2021
Chip lithography 130 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 89 Watt 45 Watt

Graphics 384SP has an age advantage of 16 years, a 1757% more advanced lithography process, and 98% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce Go 6800 Ultra and Radeon Graphics 384SP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce Go 6800 Ultra is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Graphics 384SP is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 4 votes

Rate GeForce Go 6800 Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 40 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics 384SP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce Go 6800 Ultra or Radeon Graphics 384SP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.